[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12571846#action_12571846
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-550:
----------------------------------------
Did zOlive ever post his code Jakarta Commons? Without him actually doing it,
I don't know that it is good enough legally to accept it.
Also, is your last comment such that you think there is a new patch?
> InstantiatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-550
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Store
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Karl Wettin
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Attachments: HitCollectionBench.jpg,
> LUCENE-550_20071021_no_core_changes.txt, test-reports.zip
>
>
> Represented as a coupled graph of class instances, this all-in-memory index
> store implementation delivers search results up to a 100 times faster than
> the file-centric RAMDirectory at the cost of greater RAM consumption.
> Performance seems to be a little bit better than log2n (binary search). No
> real data on that, just my eyes.
> Populated with a single document InstantiatedIndex is almost, but not quite,
> as fast as MemoryIndex.
> At 20,000 document 10-50 characters long InstantiatedIndex outperforms
> RAMDirectory some 30x,
> 15x at 100 documents of 2000 charachters length,
> and is linear to RAMDirectory at 10,000 documents of 2000 characters length.
> Mileage may vary depending on term saturation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
