On Friday 14 March 2008 11:46:42 Michael McCandless wrote: > I agree, this makes sense. I'll commit it. Thanks Stefan! > > Except, the last one you list (getBinaryValue) I think should still > return null if no field by that name exists?
Yes, you are right. Looking at the array notion made me somewhat sloppy. This is just a single element represented as byte array and you opted to return null in that case in other methods, too. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
