Do we require the contrib to adhere to the same back compatibility
rules as trunk? I don't know that it has been established.
Thoughts? Analysis is a pretty tricky one, as compared to the other
packages.
On Apr 1, 2008, at 8:32 AM, Karl Wettin (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12584119
#action_12584119 ]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1142:
-------------------------------------
I propose for this patch to be included in Lucene 3.0.0 (3.0.1?)
Updated Snowball package
------------------------
Key: LUCENE-1142
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Analysis
Reporter: Karl Wettin
Priority: Minor
Attachments: snowball.tartarus.txt
Updated Snowball contrib package
* New org.tartarus.snowball java package with patched
SnowballProgram to be abstract to avoid using reflection.
* Introducing Hungarian, Turkish and Romanian stemmers
* Introducing constructor SnowballFilter(SnowballProgram)
It is possible there have been some changes made to the some of
there stemmer algorithms between this patch and the current SVN
trunk of Lucene, an index might thus not be compatible with new
stemmers!
The API is backwards compatibile and the test pass.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
