[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12590082#action_12590082 ]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1265: ------------------------------------- I'll be looking in to this any year now. > Identify bottleneck associated with not pooling searchers > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1265 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1265 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Task > Components: Search > Reporter: Karl Wettin > > There have been multiple reports suggesting synchronization problems due to > great search performace boost while pooling searchers under heavy load. > I think this should be confirmed. Then identified and fixed, alternatively > add such a pool to the code base. > http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-searchers-%28Was%3A-CachingWrapperFilter%3A-why-cache-per-IndexReader-%29-td14916124.html#a14997611 > http://www.nabble.com/Solid-State-Drives-vs.-RAMDirectory-td16025864.html > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveSearchingSpeed > Use one instance of IndexSearcher. > Share a single IndexSearcher across queries and across threads in your > application. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]