sorry for the noise... this is just a test to java-dev.
I'm unable to post to java-user, and trying to re-subscribe didn't help.
Full text of the bounce email below, in case anyone else is seeing this.
-Yonik
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by 10.114.75.13 with SMTP id x13cs2248waa;
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.168.4 with SMTP id v4mr2332544wfo.39.1215618777288;
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <>
Received: from spwiki.spsoftware.com ([61.17.14.87])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 28si10149607wfd.4.2008.07.09.08.52.51;
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 61.17.14.87 is neither permitted
nor denied by best guess record for domain of spwiki.spsoftware.com)
client-ip=61.17.14.87;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
61.17.14.87 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for
domain of spwiki.spsoftware.com) smtp.mail=
Received: from localhost (localhost)
by spwiki.spsoftware.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) id m69Fni50017713;
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:19:44 +0530
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:19:44 +0530
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary="m69Fni50017713.1215618584/spwiki.spsoftware.com"
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
--m69Fni50017713.1215618584/spwiki.spsoftware.com
The original message was received at Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:19:38 +0530
from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
spsoft
(reason: 550 5.1.1 User unknown)
(expanded from: root)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 5.1.1 spsoft... User unknown
--m69Fni50017713.1215618584/spwiki.spsoftware.com
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: dns; spwiki.spsoftware.com
Received-From-MTA: DNS; localhost.localdomain
Arrival-Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:19:38 +0530
Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Actual-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Diagnostic-Code: X-Unix; 550 5.1.1 User unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:19:44 +0530
--m69Fni50017713.1215618584/spwiki.spsoftware.com
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from spwiki.spsoftware.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by spwiki.spsoftware.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m69FnP51017710
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:19:38 +0530
Received: from pop.spsoftindia.com
by spwiki.spsoftware.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.8)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (multi-drop); Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:19:38 +0530
(IST)
Received: from mx05.mfg.onr.siteprotect.com (unknown [192.168.33.227])
by mf20.mfg.onr.chicago.hostway (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DF224302C9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:51:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.2])
by mx05.mfg.onr.siteprotect.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A72CA55C08F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:51:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (qmail 12837 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2008 15:51:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: <java-user.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 12826 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2008 15:51:16 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:51:16 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
designates 209.85.146.176 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.146.176] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.176)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:50:25 +0000
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l24so1896286waf.11
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender
:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references
:x-google-sender-auth;
bh=yHUDkAhyxx3RzkPEXm+GhBALbeHht91V/66plEV8gO8=;
b=NH6ujX2hhaQvCqg7KCwR373EjikxQyKEzlXwkt5lz+j62yTknBLsCwT9IgJwnFpamn
hGXFK603oY07kz7R6v+7aU3xDjQhHqSXgAPE9TuIgXjEeUI8Fsx5BGzGGBje7GcqjfRQ
tFIbj0adZEirwETLEb9ZJrBklVUT0TGHlRI5c=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
:references:x-google-sender-auth;
b=HV/ayVpqHLaVUcEAqEREGNC585TvdCfPOnkxOyLWCFx4GkIaSxYa6wI2rPjxFz3ytp
WCxeOpjGRJqhiEDXOUAoQUljIu/DCtZFMHvKeaJemhNc9fWqARg/I7ZSWpgJmxykC0Lz
71KtcK+tRFjKfT+bMVixuNFtrwPGcTm37hIpA=
Received: by 10.115.92.2 with SMTP id u2mr9590818wal.33.1215618647304;
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.75.13 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:50:47 -0400
From: "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: performance feedback
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 997289174ea68835
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
Mail-Filter-Gateway: Found to be Virus Free
X-Mail-Filter-Gateway-SpamDetectionEngine: NOT SPAM,
MailFilterGateway Engine (Not Cached, Score=0, Score Required 5,
autolearn=disabled)
X-Mail-Filter-Gateway-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mail-Filter-Gateway-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No
X-Fetchmail-Warning: recipient address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
didn't match any local name
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 192.168.10.9
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Beard, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will try tweaking RAM, and check about autoCommit=false. It's on the
> future agenda to multi-thread through the index writer. The indexing
> time I quoted includes the document creation time which would definitely
> improve with multi-threading.
>
> I'm doing batch updates of up to 1000 a pop, and closing and re-opening
> the IndexWriter in between.
autoCommit=false will definitely help, and there is normally no reason
not to use it.
Bigger batches (or a single batch) will also help indexing speed. A
single IndexWriter session can now avoid copying stored fields on
segment merges.
-Yonik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--m69Fni50017713.1215618584/spwiki.spsoftware.com--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
