[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621181#action_12621181
 ] 

Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-1333:
-------------------------------------

This 'final' pattern is indeed more clear about reuse.

But still would like to clarify on what can the TokenStream assume. I think 
TokenStream cannot assume anything about the token it gets as input, and, 
once it returned a token, it cannot assume anything about how that token 
is used.  So why should it not expect being passed the token it just returned?


> Token implementation needs improvements
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1333
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1333
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Analysis
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.1
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: DM Smith
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.4
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1333-analysis.patch, LUCENE-1333-analyzers.patch, 
> LUCENE-1333-core.patch, LUCENE-1333-highlighter.patch, 
> LUCENE-1333-instantiated.patch, LUCENE-1333-lucli.patch, 
> LUCENE-1333-memory.patch, LUCENE-1333-miscellaneous.patch, 
> LUCENE-1333-queries.patch, LUCENE-1333-snowball.patch, 
> LUCENE-1333-wikipedia.patch, LUCENE-1333-wordnet.patch, 
> LUCENE-1333-xml-query-parser.patch, LUCENE-1333.patch, LUCENE-1333.patch, 
> LUCENE-1333.patch, LUCENE-1333a.txt
>
>
> This was discussed in the thread (not sure which place is best to reference 
> so here are two):
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-dev/200805.mbox/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> or to see it all at once:
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/62851
> Issues:
> 1. JavaDoc is insufficient, leading one to read the code to figure out how to 
> use the class.
> 2. Deprecations are incomplete. The constructors that take String as an 
> argument and the methods that take and/or return String should *all* be 
> deprecated.
> 3. The allocation policy is too aggressive. With large tokens the resulting 
> buffer can be over-allocated. A less aggressive algorithm would be better. In 
> the thread, the Python example is good as it is computationally simple.
> 4. The parts of the code that currently use Token's deprecated methods can be 
> upgraded now rather than waiting for 3.0. As it stands, filter chains that 
> alternate between char[] and String are sub-optimal. Currently, it is used in 
> core by Query classes. The rest are in contrib, mostly in analyzers.
> 5. Some internal optimizations can be done with regard to char[] allocation.
> 6. TokenStream has next() and next(Token), next() should be deprecated, so 
> that reuse is maximized and descendant classes should be rewritten to 
> over-ride next(Token)
> 7. Tokens are often stored as a String in a Term. It would be good to add 
> constructors that took a Token. This would simplify the use of the two 
> together.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to