On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Michael McCandless < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This definitely makes sense -- there is an issue opened, with initial > patch, to make programmatic access to CheckIndex possible, that may already > cover this? Hi, Thanks for the information! It's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1354 I took a look at the initial patch, but it still sleeps 5 seconds before doing auto fix. We may make it configurable, or provide a method fix() for end user? i.e. IndexChecker checker = new IndexChecker(....); boolean ok = checker.check(); if(!ok) { checker.fix(); // or do some other thing? } > > > Mike > > > Andrew Zhang wrote: > > Hi, >> >> Currently, CheckIndex.checkIndex sleeps 5 seconds before fixing corrupted >> index. Does it make sense to make it configurable? Some applications just >> want to fix it asap. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Andrew Zhang >> >> db4o - database for Android: www.db4o.com >> http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/ >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Best regards, Andrew Zhang db4o - database for Android: www.db4o.com http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/
