[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12634064#action_12634064
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1402:
--------------------------------------------
bq. In my opinion, for consistency, the fix() method should spell fixIndex()
like checkIndex().
OK I'll do this.
bq. Maybe the CheckIndexStatus class could be an inner class like the others.
And this too.
Thanks!
> CheckIndex API changed without backwards compaitibility
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1402
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: 2.4
> Reporter: Uwe Schindler
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-1402-uwe.patch, LUCENE-1402.patch,
> LUCENE-1402.patch
>
>
> The API of CheckIndex changed. The Check function returns a CheckIndexStatus
> and not boolean. And JavaDocs notes the boolean return value.
> I am not sure if it works, but it would be good to have the check method that
> returns boolean available @Deprecated, i.e.
> @Deprecated public static CheckIndexStatus check(Directory dir, boolean
> doFix) throws IOException {
> final CheckIndexStatus stat=this.check(dir,doFix);
> return stat.clean;
> }
> I am not sure, if it can be done with the same method name, but it prevents
> drop-in-replacements of Lucene to work.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
