Yeah, there is interest in Hebrew. People ask for it occasionally and I know one veeeery large news organization that will be looking Lucene/Solr Hebrew support in the coming weeks/months.
Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- From: Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:19:35 AM Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1406) new Arabic Analyzer (Apache license) cool. is there interest in similar basic functionality for Hebrew? same rules apply: without using GPL data (i.e. Hspell data) you can't do it right, but you can do a lot of the common stuff just like Arabic. Tokenization is a tad bit more complex, and out of box western behavior is probably annoying at the least (splitting words on punctuation where it shouldn't, etc). Robert On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Grant Ingersoll (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12635723#action_12635723 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1406: ----------------------------------------- I'll commit once 2.4 is released. > new Arabic Analyzer (Apache license) > ------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-1406 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1406 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Analysis > Reporter: Robert Muir > Assignee: Grant Ingersoll > Priority: Minor > Attachments: LUCENE-1406.patch > > > I've noticed there is no Arabic analyzer for Lucene, most likely because Tim > Buckwalter's morphological dictionary is GPL. > However, it is not necessary to have full morphological analysis engine for > a quality arabic search. > This implementation implements the light-8s algorithm present in the > following paper: http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/pubfiles/ir-249.pdf > As you can see from the paper, improvement via this method over searching > surface forms (as lucene currently does) is significant, with almost 100% > improvement in average precision. > While I personally don't think all the choices were the best, and some easily > improvements are still possible, the major motivation for implementing it > exactly the way it is presented in the paper is that the algorithm is > TREC-tested, so the precision/recall improvements to lucene are already > documented. > For a stopword list, I used a list present at > http://members.unine.ch/jacques.savoy/clef/index.html simply because the > creator of this list documents the data as BSD-licensed. > This implementation (Analyzer) consists of above mentioned stopword list plus > two filters: > ArabicNormalizationFilter: performs orthographic normalization (such as > hamza seated on alif, alif maksura, teh marbuta, removal of harakat, tatweel, > etc) > ArabicStemFilter: performs arabic light stemming > Both filters operate directly on termbuffer for maximum performance. There is > no object creation in this Analyzer. > There are no external dependencies. I've indexed about half a billion words > of arabic text and tested against that. > If there are any issues with this implementation I am willing to fix them. I > use lucene on a daily basis and would like to give something back. Thanks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Robert Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
