[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12637163#action_12637163
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410:
--------------------------------------
bq. Did you also switch to relative getInts?
No. I thought about that, but I wanted to make it work correctly first.
bq. This way, I could change my TestPFor2 to rely on self-punctuation when
reading. And, I can pass down a ByteBuffer derived directly from the file,
instead of copying bytes into byte[] first.
The only concern I have there is that when using a byte[] directly from the
file getting the int values may result in non 4 byte aligned fetches. Can
current hardware do this well?
It's tempting to move to a full C implementation directly now. Should we do
that?
A similar move was made in the past by letting gcc deal with vInts, but
meanwhile the jvms caught up there.
> PFOR implementation
> -------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1410
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Other
> Reporter: Paul Elschot
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: autogen.tgz, LUCENE-1410b.patch, TestPFor2.java,
> TestPFor2.java, TestPFor2.java
>
> Original Estimate: 21840h
> Remaining Estimate: 21840h
>
> Implementation of Patched Frame of Reference.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
