Grant Ingersoll wrote:

On Oct 19, 2008, at 12:56 AM, Mark Miller wrote:

Grant Ingersoll wrote:

Bear with me, b/c I'm not sure I'm following, but looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1422, I see at least 5 different implemented Attributes.

So, let's say I add a 5 more attributes and now have a total of 10 attributes. Are you saying that I then would have, potentially, 10 different variables that all point to the token as in the code snippet above where the casting takes place? Or would I just create a single "Super" attribute that folds in all of my new attributes, plus any other existing ones? Or, maybe, what I would do is create the 5 new attributes and then 1 new attribute that extends all 10, thus allowing me to use them individually, but saving me from having to do a whole ton of casting in my Consumer.
Potentially one consumer doing 10 things, but not likely right? I mean, things will stay logical as they are now, and rather than a super consumer doing everything, we will still have a chain of consumers each doing its own piece. So more likely, maybe something comes along every so often (another 5, over *much* time, say) and each time we add a Consumer that uses one or two TokenStream types. And then its just an implementation detail on whether you make a composite TokenStream - if you have added 10 new attributes and see it fit to make one consumer use them all, sure, make a composite, super type, but in my mind, the way its done in the example code is clearer/cleaner for a handful of TokenStream types. And even if you do make the composite,super type, its likely to just be a sugar wrapper anyway - the implementation for say, payload and positions, should probably be maintained in their own classes anyway.

Well, there are 5 different attributes already, all of which are commonly used. Seems weird to have to cast the same var 5 different ways. Definitely agree that one would likely deal with this by wrapping, but then you end up either needing to extend your wrapper or add new wrappers...
Okay, I see, all of that is going to happen in one Consumer; your not going to want to read the TokenStream more than once. I see your point now.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to