[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646280#action_12646280
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-427:
------------------------------------
Tempted to close this. Seems to me you are better off just calling rewrite and
caching the booleanquery yourself rather than holding on it in the query. It
could be quite big, and generally you wouldn't want to pay to keep it around,
especially if queries where used in a cache or something.
> PrefixQuery.extractTerms() missing
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-427
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-427
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: CVS Nightly - Specify date in submission
> Environment: Operating System: All
> Platform: All
> Reporter: Mikko Noromaa
> Assignee: Lucene Developers
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: PrefixQuery.diff
>
>
> RC1.9 on 2005-08-21. I will attach a patch to add my version of
> extractTerms().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
