[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12655757#action_12655757 ]
Tim Sturge commented on LUCENE-1487: ------------------------------------ No problem at all. Should I assume this means that the idea is generally considered sound; the only question is getting something with sufficient tests/docs/level of finish? I was expecting to get comments about the implementation first; last time what ended up going in was very different (in good ways) from my initial submission. > FieldCacheTermsFilter > --------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1487 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1487 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Search > Affects Versions: 2.4 > Reporter: Tim Sturge > Fix For: 2.9 > > Attachments: FieldCacheTermsFilter.java > > > This is a companion to FieldCacheRangeFilter except it operates on a set of > terms rather than a range. It works best when the set is comparatively large > or the terms are comparatively common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org