[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656988#action_12656988
 ] 

Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410:
--------------------------------------

I'd like to split off the performance test cases from the functional test cases 
for this, but there does not seem to be a nice way to do that using the current 
test methods via ant.

I'm thinking of using a special class name prefix like PerfTest... (or maybe 
something shorter like Perf...) and adding a test target for that in the build 
scripts.

Are there other places where splitting performance tests and functional tests 
could be useful?
When so, what would be a good way to implement it?

> PFOR implementation
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1410
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Other
>            Reporter: Paul Elschot
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: autogen.tgz, LUCENE-1410b.patch, LUCENE-1410c.patch, 
> LUCENE-1410d.patch, TermQueryTests.tgz, TestPFor2.java, TestPFor2.java, 
> TestPFor2.java
>
>   Original Estimate: 21840h
>  Remaining Estimate: 21840h
>
> Implementation of Patched Frame of Reference.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to