It would be great to get it consistent I cherry picked when someone pointed it out to me

Erik Hatcher wrote:
My thoughts... bring over any simple functions like these are that are generally useful.    At a quick glance, the functions in Solr's NumberUtils are generally useful and fit well in Lucene's NumberTools.  What's the harm?

   Erik

On Dec 16, 2008, at 9:14 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:

I posted this same question for the same reasons a while back...
http://markmail.org/message/mji7jnpa5xjfflmw

I'm looking at local lucene and trying to figure out how it could go into lucene.  As is, locallucene depends on solr since it needs NumberUtils.

Any change of heart for moving it into lucene?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org


--
Patrick O'Leary

AOL Local Search Technologies
Phone: + 1 703 265 8763

You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles.
 Do you understand this? 
And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat.
  - Albert Einstein
View Patrick O Leary's LinkedIn profileView Patrick O Leary's profile

Reply via email to