[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12666081#action_12666081 ]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1524: ---------------------------------- my take is similar to Michael... The test in the patch doesn't seem valid to me. Specifying a reverse sort on FIELD_1 just means that the documents must be returned in descending order of the value in FIELD_1 -- it does not say anything about breaking ties when two docs have equal values for FIELD_1, the behavior in that case is undefined (and just so happens to be consistent) > True reverse sorting > -------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1524 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1524 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Search > Affects Versions: 2.4 > Reporter: Jiri Kuhn > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.4.1 > > Attachments: reverse.patch > > > If documents sorted have the same sort value, they are sorted in the same way > even if the reverse flag is true. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org