[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12666081#action_12666081
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1524:
----------------------------------

my take is similar to Michael...

The test in the patch doesn't seem valid to me.  Specifying a reverse sort on 
FIELD_1 just means that the documents must be returned in descending order of 
the value in  FIELD_1 -- it does not say anything about breaking ties when two 
docs have equal values for FIELD_1, the behavior in that case is undefined (and 
just so happens to be consistent)


> True reverse sorting
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1524
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1524
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Jiri Kuhn
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.4.1
>
>         Attachments: reverse.patch
>
>
> If documents sorted have the same sort value, they are sorted in the same way 
> even if the reverse flag is true.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to