[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12668954#action_12668954 ]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1476: ------------------------------------------ > Maybe we should close this issue with a won't-fix and start a new one for > filtered deletions? We need more performance data before going ahead with tombstone deletions. Sounds like the next step. > BitVector implement DocIdSet, IndexReader returns DocIdSet deleted docs > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1476 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Index > Affects Versions: 2.4 > Reporter: Jason Rutherglen > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hacked-deliterator.patch, LUCENE-1476.patch, > LUCENE-1476.patch, LUCENE-1476.patch, LUCENE-1476.patch, LUCENE-1476.patch, > quasi_iterator_deletions.diff, quasi_iterator_deletions_r2.diff, > quasi_iterator_deletions_r3.diff, searchdeletes.alg, sortBench2.py, > sortCollate2.py, TestDeletesDocIdSet.java > > Original Estimate: 12h > Remaining Estimate: 12h > > Update BitVector to implement DocIdSet. Expose deleted docs DocIdSet from > IndexReader. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org