[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12674316#action_12674316
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1537:
------------------------------------------
bq. handle non-optimized readers
Why is it that the incoming reader must be optimized? I did try to change this
and ran into issues.
bq. Perhaps we should move deleted documents to the reader?
That makes sense. Was there a reason to have it in both?
bq. Is this refactor just for debugging purposes
It is for debugging.
> InstantiatedIndexReader.clone
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1537
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1537
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib/*
> Affects Versions: 2.4
> Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
> Assignee: Karl Wettin
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1537.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 2h
> Remaining Estimate: 2h
>
> This patch will implement IndexReader.clone for InstantiatedIndexReader.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
