I believe we still need this, for remote filesystems (like NFS) that
have inconsistent client-side caching.
The fsync() ensures the local IO system has moved the bytes/file
metadata to stable storage, but I'd expect remote caches would still
potentially be stale.
Mike
Michael Busch wrote:
Hi,
with LUCENE-1044 we sync the FS after writing files. Do we still
need the segments.gen file to handle stale caches correctly?
-Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
