You're right ... I missed that. My fault :) On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Michael McCandless < [email protected]> wrote:
> Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > bq. I personally don't understand why MRHC was invented in the first > place. > > > > The evolution of MRHC is in the comments of LUCENE-1483 - a lot of > comments > > to wade through though. > > MRHC was created because simply adding setNextReader to HC would break > back compat, because collect(...) is called on the un-rebased doc. Ie > we need a new class so we can tell that it will handle re-basing the > doc itself. > > Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
