[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12700944#action_12700944
 ] 

Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1345:
------------------------------------------

Even though Paul's patch doesn't pass a test, it sounds like it
can be benchmarked? Part of the goal of patch is to make certain
queries faster? This could help with how we approach optimizing
LUCENE-1345.

> Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1345
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Paul Elschot
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: booleansetperf.txt, DisjunctionDISI.java, 
> DisjunctionDISI.patch, DisjunctionDISI.patch, 
> LUCENE-1345-Filter+Query-merge.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch, 
> LUCENE-1345.patch, OpenBitSetIteratorExperiment.java, TestIteratorPerf.java, 
> TestIteratorPerf.java
>
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to