[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704462#action_12704462
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1614:
------------------------------------
bq. I mean the scorer should go straight to the doc I asked for and test
whether it accepts that doc and do nothing else.
Just to clarify for myself, in the example I gave above, suppose thar the
scorer is on "3" and you call check(8). Do you expect it to go to 10, realize
that 8 is not supported and go back to 3? Can it be called with check(7)
afterwards? If not, then why not use advance(8), get back 10 and realize 8 is
not supported? You should be able to call advance(9) without it advancing
beyond 10 (which it's currently on).
Your comment on TermScorer just reinforces my confusion - what is this API good
for, and what's missing in advance(target) today? Can't ConjunctionScorer call
advance until it gets a response which is not what was asked for?
> Add next() and skipTo() variants to DocIdSetIterator that return the current
> doc, instead of boolean
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1614
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> See
> http://www.nabble.com/Another-possible-optimization---now-in-DocIdSetIterator-p23223319.html
> for the full discussion. The basic idea is to add variants to those two
> methods that return the current doc they are at, to save successive calls to
> doc(). If there are no more docs, return -1. A summary of what was discussed
> so far:
> # Deprecate those two methods.
> # Add nextDoc() and skipToDoc(int) that return doc, with default impl in DISI
> (calls next() and skipTo() respectively, and will be changed to abstract in
> 3.0).
> #* I actually would like to propose an alternative to the names: advance()
> and advance(int) - the first advances by one, the second advances to target.
> # Wherever these are used, do something like '(doc = advance()) >= 0' instead
> of comparing to -1 for improved performance.
> I will post a patch shortly
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
