Michael: Actually this is not what I meant. It was discussion that was wrapped in Lucene-1345 where I posted some optimizations for Conjunction and Disjunction Scorers and some numbers. Because of the confusion of what Lucene-1345 is, the loop was never closed. I am just writing to follow up.
Thanks -John On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > I think you mean this thread: > > http://markmail.org/message/idgcnxmbyo3yjdiw > > right? > > I would love to see these in Lucene... P4Delta, which Paul has started > under LUCENE-1410, is clearly a win, but is a biggish change to Lucene > since all offsets would need to become "blockID + offsetWithinBlock". > LUCENE-1458 (further steps flexible indexing) tries to make things > generic enough that P4Delta can simply be a different codec. > > On the logic operators for combining DocIDSets... how do these differ > from what we already do in BooleanScorer[2]? (I haven't had a chance > to get a good look at Kamikaze yet). > > Mike > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:34 PM, John Wang <john.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Guys: > > A while ago I posted some enhancements to disjunction and > conjunction > > docIdSetIterators that showed performance improvements to Lucene-1345. I > > think it got mixed up with another discussion on that issue. Was > wondering > > what happened with it and what are the plans. > > Thanks > > -John > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
