[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12715908#action_12715908
 ] 

Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1651:
-----------------------------------------

bq. Patch looks good Earwin, thanks!
I believe the readers can be cleaned up further, but I'm short on time and 
don't want to delay it for another week or two, and then rebase it against 
updated trunk once again. Might as well do that under a separate issue.

bq. I think we should now rename MultiSegmentReader to DirectoryIndexReader?
Maybe DirectoryReader instead of DirectoryIndexReader? But all three are in 
fact okay with me, I really don't have any preference here.


> Make IndexReader.open() always return MSR to simplify (re-)opens.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1651
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: Earwin Burrfoot
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1651-tag.patch, LUCENE-1651.patch, 
> LUCENE-1651.patch
>
>
> As per discussion in mailing list, I'm making DirectoryIndexReader.open() 
> always return MSR, even for single-segment indexes.
> While theoretically valid in the past (if you make sure to keep your index 
> constantly optimized) this feature is made practically obsolete by 
> per-segment collection.
> The patch somewhat de-hairies (re-)open logic for MSR/SR.
> SR no longer needs an ability to pose as toplevel directory-owning IR.
> All related logic is moved from DIR to MSR.
> DIR becomes almost empty, and copying two or three remaining fields over to 
> MSR/SR, I remove it.
> Lots of tests fail, as they rely on SR returned from IR.open(), I fix by 
> introducing SR.getOnlySegmentReader static package-private method.
> Some previous bugs are uncovered, one is fixed in LUCENE-1645, another 
> (partially fixed in LUCENE-1648) is fixed in this patch. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to