[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12722199#action_12722199 ]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1687: ----------------------------------------- Uwe, The ENTIRE point of this issue is to get rid of EFC. It is purposely breaking backwards compatibility. It is a stupid class put in for stupid reasons. If anyone is referring to this class, they can change to use the FieldCache. If you're not going to remove it, I will. > Remove ExtendedFieldCache by rolling functionality into FieldCache > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-1687 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Grant Ingersoll > Assignee: Uwe Schindler > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.9 > > > It is silly that we have ExtendedFieldCache. It is a workaround to our > supposed back compatibility problem. This patch will merge the > ExtendedFieldCache interface into FieldCache, thereby breaking back > compatibility, but creating a much simpler API for FieldCache. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org