[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12722199#action_12722199
 ] 

Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1687:
-----------------------------------------

Uwe,

The ENTIRE point of this issue is to get rid of EFC.  It is purposely breaking 
backwards compatibility.  It is a stupid class put in for stupid reasons.  If 
anyone is referring to this class, they can change to use the FieldCache.

If you're not going to remove it, I will.  

> Remove ExtendedFieldCache by rolling functionality into FieldCache
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1687
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> It is silly that we have ExtendedFieldCache.  It is a workaround to our 
> supposed back compatibility problem.  This patch will merge the 
> ExtendedFieldCache interface into FieldCache, thereby breaking back 
> compatibility, but creating a much simpler API for FieldCache.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to