[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12724815#action_12724815 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1709: -------------------------------------------- Actually I see decent gains from concurrency: when I run tests with 6 threads my tests run a little over 3X faster (12:59 with 1 thread and 4:15 with 6 threads). I'm using a Python script that launches the threads, each specifying -Dtestpackage to run a certain subset of Lucene's tests. This is on an OpenSolaris (2009.06) machine, with a Core i7 920 CPU (= 8 cores presented to the OS) and an Intel X25M SSD, 12 GB RAM. The hardware has quite a bit of concurrency. > Parallelize Tests > ----------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1709 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Index > Affects Versions: 2.4.1 > Reporter: Jason Rutherglen > Fix For: 3.0 > > Original Estimate: 48h > Remaining Estimate: 48h > > The Lucene tests can be parallelized to make for a faster testing system. > This task from ANT can be used: > http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/parallel.html > Previous discussion: > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/69669 > Notes from Mike M.: > {quote} > I'd love to see a clean solution here (the tests are embarrassingly > parallelizable, and we all have machines with good concurrency these > days)... I have a rather hacked up solution now, that uses > "-Dtestpackage=XXX" to split the tests up. > Ideally I would be able to say "use N threads" and it'd do the right > thing... like the -j flag to make. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org