[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725521#action_12725521
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1713:
---------------------------------------
Should I prepare a patch later?
I would simply rename the files in core and then change the tests and rest to
find any references to the old RangeQuery/Filter (compile failures). After that
I create a deprecated subclass of TermRange* with the old name and all ctors
from the old class. The new class will only supply the new ctors (no deprecated
ones using Term, mapping is done in the subclass).
> Rename RangeQuery -> TermRangeQuery
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1713
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1713
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.9
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> Since we now have NumericRangeQuery (LUCENE-1701) we should rename RangeQuery
> to TextRangeQuery to make it clear that TextRangeQuery (TermRangeQuery?
> StringRangeQuery) is based entirely on text comparison.
> And, existing users on upgrading to 2.9 and using RangeQuery for [slow]
> numeric searching would realize they now have a good option for numeric range
> searching.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
