[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727683#action_12727683
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1721:
--------------------------------------
bq. Absolutely nothing would have to have actually changed in order to reuse an
old IndexReader.
Right - see the javadoc for reopen() then... it currently says that if nothing
has changed, you get the same IndexReader instance back.
> IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1721
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Reporter: Shay Banon
>
> It would be great if IndexWriter would allow for deletion by doc ids as well.
> It makes sense for cases where a "query" has been executed beforehand, and
> later, that query needs to be applied in order to delete the matched
> documents.
> More information here:
> http://www.nabble.com/Delete-by-docId-in-IndexWriter-td24239930.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
