I'd say out of these libraries only Lucene and Sphinx are worth mentioning.
There's also MG4J, which wasn't covered and has a nice algorithmic background. Anybody knows other interesting open-source search engines? On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 00:39, John Wang<john.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Vik did a very nice job. > One thing the experiment did not mention is that Lucene handles incremental > updates, whereas many of the other "competitors" do not. So the indexing > performance comparison is not really fair. > -John > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/ >> >> I imagine many of you already saw this -- Lucene does pretty well in >> this "shootout". >> The only area it tended to lag, it seems, is memory usage and speed in >> some cases. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > -- Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (ear...@gmail.com) Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423 ICQ: 104465785 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
