[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12740155#action_12740155
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1749:
-------------------------------------
P.S. I'm not sure we want to go with the way I have changed the tests here.
I switched things to go per subreader rather than use the overall reader - this
is how things happen in IndexSearcher now. But we lose the top level reader
test. We might want to do it both ways, and when doing it by top reader, ignore
the triggered insanity check?
> FieldCache introspection API
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1749
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: fieldcache-introspection.patch,
> LUCENE-1749-hossfork.patch, LUCENE-1749.patch, LUCENE-1749.patch,
> LUCENE-1749.patch, LUCENE-1749.patch, LUCENE-1749.patch, LUCENE-1749.patch,
> LUCENE-1749.patch, LUCENE-1749.patch, LUCENE-1749.patch, LUCENE-1749.patch,
> LUCENE-1749.patch
>
>
> FieldCache should expose an Expert level API for runtime introspection of the
> FieldCache to provide info about what is in the FieldCache at any given
> moment. We should also provide utility methods for sanity checking that the
> FieldCache doesn't contain anything "odd"...
> * entries for the same reader/field with different types/parsers
> * entries for the same field/type/parser in a reader and it's subreader(s)
> * etc...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
