I think I originally set it up, and I don't think (can't remember) any reason why I did only src/java. I agree we should have it cover all sources.
Mike On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Mark Miller<markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > bq. but does anyone know of a reason why it was setup this way? > > No, but pending that answer, +1 on making it check all of the source files. > > Chris Hostetter wrote: >> >> I noticed that the Release TODO recommends running "ant rat-sources" >> to look for possible errors ... but the rat-soruces tag is setup to >> only analyze the src/java directory -- not any of the other source >> files included in the release (contrib, tests, demo, etc...) let alone >> the full release artifacts >> >> I though the whole point of RAT is to make sure you aren't releasing >> something you shouldn't be? >> >> I'm currently running rat on the dist zip/tgz products ... but does >> anyone know of a reason why it was setup this way? >> >> >> >> -Hoss >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > > -- > - Mark > > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org