I think I originally set it up, and I don't think (can't remember) any
reason why I did only src/java.  I agree we should have it cover all
sources.

Mike

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Mark Miller<markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> bq. but does anyone know of a reason why it was setup this way?
>
> No, but pending that answer, +1 on making it check all of the source files.
>
> Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>
>> I noticed that the Release TODO recommends running "ant rat-sources"
>> to look for possible errors ... but the rat-soruces tag is setup to
>> only analyze the src/java directory -- not any of the other source
>> files included in the release (contrib, tests, demo, etc...) let alone
>> the full release artifacts
>>
>> I though the whole point of RAT is to make sure you aren't releasing
>> something you shouldn't be?
>>
>> I'm currently running rat on the dist zip/tgz products ... but does
>> anyone know of a reason why it was setup this way?
>>
>>
>>
>> -Hoss
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to