[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749117#action_12749117
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872:
--------------------------------------------
bq. Will we mark it as experimental or not?
Yes, I think we should keep the experimental warning. I didn't mean to remove
any -- I'll make sure they're all still there.
bq. By the way, I also reviewd the LIA chapter and have also seen the reference
to DateTools (will send you my updates soon)
Excellent, thanks!
bq. ate to a String with a special date resolution and then convertin back to
numeric is somehow ineffective. When indexing only hour resolution, I would
take Date.getTime() / 3600L / 1000L.
True, and that'll work for DAY as well, but not for MONTH / YEAR resolution.
bq. Maybe you could copy some of your explanations also to NumericTokenStream,
e.g. the example. In the original, both classes had similar introduction texts.
OK I'll update NumericTokenStream too.
> Improve javadocs for Numeric*
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1872
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1872.patch
>
>
> I'm working on improving Numeric* javadocs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
