[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750664#action_12750664
 ] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1877:
---------------------------------------

Yes, I already prepared the BW test change (i simply disabled this test with 
the lock prefix).

{quote}
bq. all FS-based lock factories use the same prefix encoding. They are now 
(mostly) compatible. E.g. a lock obtained with NativeFSLockFactory would also 
be seen as locked with SimpleFSLockFactory

Ie, it's unsupported to mix different LockFactory impls. 
{quote}

One important fact, because I enabled this: The deprecated methods in 
IndexWriter/IndexReader taking String/File args and FSDirectory.getDirectory() 
still use the SimpleFSLockFactory per default (or the system property). If some 
use mixes these deprecated calls with e.g. FSDir.open() he has still a chance 
to get locking work. But it is unsupported. I also added a extra note in the 
CHANGES.txt now, that warns because of this trap.

> Use NativeFSLockFactory as default for new API (direct ctors & FSDir.open)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1877
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Javadocs
>            Reporter: Mark Miller
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1877.patch, LUCENE-1877.patch, LUCENE-1877.patch
>
>
> A user requested we add a note in IndexWriter alerting the availability of 
> NativeFSLockFactory (allowing you to avoid retaining locks on abnormal jvm 
> exit). Seems reasonable to me - we want users to be able to easily stumble 
> upon this class. The below code looks like a good spot to add a note - could 
> also improve whats there a bit - opening an IndexWriter does not necessarily 
> create a lock file - that would depend on the LockFactory used.
> {code}  <p>Opening an <code>IndexWriter</code> creates a lock file for the 
> directory in use. Trying to open
>   another <code>IndexWriter</code> on the same directory will lead to a
>   {...@link LockObtainFailedException}. The {...@link 
> LockObtainFailedException}
>   is also thrown if an IndexReader on the same directory is used to delete 
> documents
>   from the index.</p>{code}
> Anyone remember why NativeFSLockFactory is not the default over 
> SimpleFSLockFactory?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to