[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753746#action_12753746
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1906:
-------------------------------------
bq. Hmmm, I had missed that 2.9 required a recompile.
Because it was never officially said one way or another, I was pretty loose
about it:
We recommend that you recompile your application with Lucene 2.9
rather than attempting to "drop" it in. This will alert you to any
issues you may have to fix if you are affected by one of the backward
compatibility breaks. As always, its a really good idea to thoroughly
read CHANGES.txt before upgrading. Also, remember that this is a
release candidate, and not the final Lucene 2.9 release.
I should probably change it to required. I am saying, recompile or be
prepared for a random break. Thats got to be a euphemism for recompile required.
> Problem with CharStream and Tokenizers with custom reset(Reader) method
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1906
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Analysis
> Affects Versions: 2.9
> Reporter: Uwe Schindler
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: backwards-break.patch, LUCENE-1906.patch,
> LUCENE-1906.patch, LUCENE-1906_contrib.patch
>
>
> When reviewing the new CharStream code added to Tokenizers, I found a
> serious problem with backwards compatibility and other Tokenizers, that do
> not override reset(CharStream).
> The problem is, that e.g. CharTokenizer only overrides reset(Reader):
> {code}
> public void reset(Reader input) throws IOException {
> super.reset(input);
> bufferIndex = 0;
> offset = 0;
> dataLen = 0;
> }
> {code}
> If you reset such a Tokenizer with another CharStream (not a Reader), this
> method will never be called and breaking the whole Tokenizer.
> As CharStream extends Reader, I propose to remove this reset(CharStream
> method) and simply do an instanceof check to detect if the supplied Reader
> is no CharStream and wrap it. We could also remove the extra ctor (because
> most Tokenizers have no support for passing CharStreams). If the ctor also
> checks with instanceof and warps as needed the code is backwards compatible
> and we do not need to add additional ctors in subclasses.
> As this instanceof check is always done in CharReader.get() why not remove
> ctor(CharStream) and reset(CharStream) completely?
> Any thoughts?
> I would like to fix this somehow before RC4, I'm, sorry :(
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
