Thanks Mark for the clarification! -John On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah it is, sorry :( > > Check out the back compat break section in changes - its the first > section I think. > > John Wang wrote: > > Hi Guys: > > > > A quick comment on 2.9 release: > > > > org.apache.lucene.Weight interface has been changed to an abstract > > class. This is a non-backward compatible change and would break many > > custom Query implementations. Is this intentional? > > > > Thanks > > > > -John > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de > > <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de>> wrote: > > > > > Oddly though, while all of the Maven hashes are in a file thats > > 32bytes, > > > when I save this hash, its 33bytes. > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Line feed? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > <mailto:java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > <mailto:java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> > > > > > > > -- > - Mark > > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
