Steven A Rowe wrote: > Mark Miller wrote: > >> <release> >> <Version> >> + <name>Lucene 2.9.0</name> >> + <created>2009-09-23</created> >> + <revision>2.9.0</revision> >> + </Version> >> > > Stupid question from the peanut gallery: > > Doesn't a VOTE require 3 days? I ask because (3 + 2009-09-21) = 2009-09-24, > not -23. > > Steve > > Not stupid - but evil :) Your gonna make me package again!
I almost asked about that. Officially, from Apache, it just takes 3 +1 votes. Beyond that, each project can have its own rules. Now that you mention it, someone has mentioned we have the 3 day rule before. I was thinking ... possibly ... monday, tuesday, wednesday, release at midnight ?! I actually almost sent an email questioning it, but the day is supposed to be an estimate, so I figure its likely to be off a day or two anyway. Perhaps I can't get the stuff out to the mirrors till a day later, even if I estimate 3 days ahead? I'll admit I fudged to try and speed things along a bit. What it all means? I dunno. Probably more work for me :) -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
