Michael McCandless wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Mark Miller (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > >> it only complained about the $id issue in wildcardtermenum >> > > This bites me all the time. > > Can we simply remove all $Id tags from the class javadocs? Is there > some value to having $Id in the javadocs? > > It produces a line like this: > > * @version $Id: WildcardTermEnum.java 783371 2009-06-10 14:39:56Z mikemccand > $ > > Ie, source file name, svn revision, date, user who last committed. > > If for some reason we find this information compelling we could move > it eg above the class javadoc into a comment? Then I think at least > we'd have fewer patch problems... > > Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > No use it for myself - and since its only in a handful of classes, I can't see someone making an argument to keep it. We either want it across the board or we plain don't need it IMO. And its got no value to me.
-- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
