[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763180#action_12763180
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1938:
------------------------------------
Hi,
I looked at the pipeline PrecedenceQueryNodeProcessorPipeline, it contains some
complex logic off removing a processor from the
StandardQueryNodeProcessorPipeline.
I think it would be better to have a common ancestor,
CommonQueryNodeProcessorPipeline, that both StandardQueryNodeProcessorPipeline
and PrecedenceQueryNodeProcessorPipeline can extend.
It should make it easier for people reading the code.
What do you think?
> Precedence query parser using the contrib/queryparser framework
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1938
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1938
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: contrib/*
> Affects Versions: 2.9
> Reporter: Adriano Crestani
> Assignee: Adriano Crestani
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1938.patch
>
>
> Extend the current StandardQueryParser on contrib so it supports boolean
> precedence
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
