[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12769517#action_12769517
 ] 

Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1960:
---------------------------------------

{quote}
But this is only one-time. As soon as it is optimized it is fast again. Because 
of that I said, one could use a tool to enforce optimization or the new 
IndexSplitter can also do the copy old to new index.
{quote}

That's right, I'm just trying to make sure we all understand the consequences. 
Would be nice to know how much longer it takes though.

If everyone else is ok with this approach I can work on a patch. 

> Remove deprecated Field.Store.COMPRESS
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1960
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Michael Busch
>            Assignee: Michael Busch
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>         Attachments: lucene-1960-1.patch, lucene-1960.patch
>
>
> Also remove FieldForMerge and related code.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to