[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1960:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: index.29.nocfs.zip
                index.29.cfs.zip
                lucene-1960-1.patch

Modified patch with testcase for backwards compatibility. It was a little bit 
trick to check if a field was actually compressed in the source index, but it 
worked with FieldSelectorResult.SIZE and a test-compression/chars*2. The test 
was done before/after optimize and it is verified that before the field was 
still compressed (even it is larger in reality, harhar) and uncompressed after 
optimize.

Should I commit the index creation to the current 2.9 branch or not?

I can commit this, if everybody is happy (because I have the zip files already 
in my checkout added). Or will you do it, Michael?

> Remove deprecated Field.Store.COMPRESS
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1960
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Michael Busch
>            Assignee: Michael Busch
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>         Attachments: index.29.cfs.zip, index.29.nocfs.zip, 
> lucene-1960-1.patch, lucene-1960-1.patch, lucene-1960-1.patch, 
> lucene-1960.patch, optimize-time.txt
>
>
> Also remove FieldForMerge and related code.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to