> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Yonik Seeley > <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > >> Looks good. One thing: > >> > >> In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev > in the > >> version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with > having > >> -dev in the source artefact, because if someone compiles his own bin > from > >> the artefact, it should have -dev in it, because it's not an official > build. > > > > Right, having the "-dev" when someone tries to build it themselves is > > the way we should keep it. > > +1 > > So this means in general when doing the release, we leave the -dev in > there? Ie, leaving the -dev doesn't affect the binary release (which > gets its version, eg in the JAR's manifest, from the -Dversion=2.9.1 > on the ant command line), I think?
Exactly! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
