As a followon to LUCENE-1573, we had stated that in 3.0 instead of throwing RuntimeException when a Thread inside Lucene is interrupted, we would throw InterruptedException.
Do we want to do this? Technically I think it's the right thing to do, but, I started to implement it and found that it basically results in nearly every API now throwing InterruptedException (just like IOException). Thoughts? Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
