On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: >> As DM Smith said, since the bug is longstanding and we are only now >> just hearing about it, it appears not to be that severe in practice. >> I guess users don't often mix coord enabled & disabled BQs, that are >> otherwise identical, in the same cache. > > DM Smith also wanted this in 2.9.2, which I think it's fine. The fix is so > simple, we could simply merge it to 2.9 branch. And Erick Erickson also > noted that this bug is longstanding. > >> So I think we ship 3.0.0 anyways? > > +1, I just wanted to ask. Now votes are required, I have zero counting ones > until now. +1 for not respinning 3.0 with this bug. I would also agree with the statements above! +1 for 3.0 even not being a PMC member :)
simon > > Uwe > > > >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Hoss reported a bug about two fields missing in the equals/hashCode of >> > BooleanQuery (which exists since 1.9, >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2092). Should I respin 3.0 >> > because of this or just release it? Speak out load, if you want to >> respin >> > (else vote)! >> > >> > We will apply the bugfix at least to 2.9.2 and 3.0.1 >> > >> > Uwe >> > >> > ----- >> > Uwe Schindler >> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> > http://www.thetaphi.de >> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] >> >> Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 4:07 PM >> >> To: gene...@lucene.apache.org; java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2) >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I have built the artifacts for the final release of "Apache Lucene Java >> >> 3.0.0" a second time, because of a bug in the TokenStream API (found by >> >> Shai >> >> Erera, who wanted to make "bad" things with addAttribute, breaking its >> >> behaviour, LUCENE-2088) and an improvement in NumericRangeQuery (to >> >> prevent >> >> stack overflow, LUCENE-2087). They are targeted for release on 2009-11- >> 25. >> >> >> >> The artifacts are here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-3.0.0-take2/ >> >> >> >> You find the changes in the corresponding sub folder. The SVN revision >> is >> >> 883080, here the manifest with build system info: >> >> >> >> Manifest-Version: 1.0 >> >> Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.7.0 >> >> Created-By: 1.5.0_22-b03 (Sun Microsystems Inc.) >> >> Specification-Title: Lucene Search Engine >> >> Specification-Version: 3.0.0 >> >> Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation >> >> Implementation-Title: org.apache.lucene >> >> Implementation-Version: 3.0.0 883080 - 2009-11-22 15:52:49 >> >> Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation >> >> X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.5 >> >> X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.5 >> >> >> >> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as "Apache Lucene >> Java >> >> 3.0.0". >> >> >> >> We need at least 3 binding (PMC) votes. >> >> >> >> Thanks everyone for all their hard work on this and I am very sorry for >> >> requesting a vote again, but that's life! Thanks Shai for the pointer >> to >> >> the >> >> bug! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Here is the proposed release note, please edit, if needed: >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --- >> >> >> >> Hello Lucene users, >> >> >> >> On behalf of the Lucene dev community (a growing community far larger >> than >> >> just the committers) I would like to announce the release of Lucene >> Java >> >> 3.0: >> >> >> >> The new version is mostly a cleanup release without any new features. >> All >> >> deprecations targeted to be removed in version 3.0 were removed. If you >> >> are >> >> upgrading from version 2.9.1 of Lucene, you have to fix all deprecation >> >> warnings in your code base to be able to recompile against this >> version. >> >> >> >> This is the first Lucene release with Java 5 as a minimum requirement. >> The >> >> API was cleaned up to make use of Java 5's generics, varargs, enums, >> and >> >> autoboxing. New users of Lucene are advised to use this version for new >> >> developments, because it has a clean, type safe new API. Upgrading >> users >> >> can >> >> now remove unnecessary casts and add generics to their code, too. If >> you >> >> have not upgraded your installation to Java 5, please read the file >> >> JRE_VERSION_MIGRATION.txt (please note that this is not related to >> Lucene >> >> 3.0, it will also happen with any previous release when you upgrade >> your >> >> Java environment). >> >> >> >> Lucene 3.0 has some changes regarding compressed fields: 2.9 already >> >> deprecated compressed fields; support for them was removed now. Lucene >> 3.0 >> >> is still able to read indexes with compressed fields, but as soon as >> >> merges >> >> occur or the index is optimized, all compressed fields are decompressed >> >> and >> >> converted to Field.Store.YES. Because of this, indexes with compressed >> >> fields can suddenly get larger. >> >> >> >> While we generally try and maintain full backwards compatibility >> between >> >> major versions, Lucene 3.0 has some minor breaks, mostly related to >> >> deprecation removal, pointed out in the 'Changes in backwards >> >> compatibility >> >> policy' section of CHANGES.txt. Notable are: >> >> >> >> - IndexReader.open(Directory) now opens in read-only mode per default >> >> (this >> >> method was deprecated because of that in 2.9). The same occurs to >> >> IndexSearcher. >> >> >> >> - Already started in 2.9, core TokenStreams are now made final to >> enforce >> >> the decorator pattern. >> >> >> >> - If you interrupt an IndexWriter merge thread, IndexWriter now throws >> an >> >> unchecked ThreadInterruptedException that extends RuntimeException and >> >> clears the interrupt status. >> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Uwe >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
