It's out and already on most of the mirrors... ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:31 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1844) Speed up junit tests > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > They're ready to go, but at Uwe's suggestion, I've been waiting for 3.0 > to > > get settled before prompting someone to apply this patch. I was going to > > generate a new patch for this and for 2037 (junit4 tests) just to make > sure > > they were easy to apply. But if you're willing, the patches are already > > attached to the JIRA issues. Do note that the decision in > > MinBooleanShouldMatch to stop checking the query after 100 rather than > > checking all 1,000 is included in the patch.... > > Uwe do you still think we should wait? 3.0.0 looks like it's "out"? > > > Do you want to apply the patches or should I regenerate? It's no big > deal to > > regenerate them and I'll have a better feel for reconciling any > conflicts. I > > don't know whether there even *are* any conflicts, but just in case.... > > Let's hold up until we hear from Uwe... > > > For my info, though, if I have a more recent patch that *replaces* an > > earlier patch, especially one that hasn't yet been applied, is it > preferred > > to delete the earlier patch when providing a new one? > > Actually in general I prefer people not delete the old patches... > This way if there's a question/confusion we can always go back & > compare old to new. > > Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
