[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785344#action_12785344
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2074:
-------------------------------------
bq. Will the old jflex fail on %unicode {x.y} syntax ???
I haven't tested it, but JFlex <1.5 likely will fail on this syntax, since
nothing is expected after the %unicode directive.
bq. Hopefully JFlex 1.5 comes out until we release 3.1, I would be happy.
I think the JFlex 1.5 release will happen before March of next year, since
we're down to just a few blocking issues.
> Use a separate JFlex generated Unicode 4 by Java 5 compatible
> StandardTokenizer
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2074
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Uwe Schindler
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: jflex-1.4.1-vs-1.5-snapshot.diff, jflexwarning.patch,
> LUCENE-2074-lucene30.patch, LUCENE-2074.patch, LUCENE-2074.patch,
> LUCENE-2074.patch, LUCENE-2074.patch, LUCENE-2074.patch, LUCENE-2074.patch
>
>
> The current trunk version of StandardTokenizerImpl was generated by Java 1.4
> (according to the warning). In Java 3.0 we switch to Java 1.5, so we should
> regenerate the file.
> After regeneration the Tokenizer behaves different for some characters.
> Because of that we should only use the new TokenizerImpl when
> Version.LUCENE_30 or LUCENE_31 is used as matchVersion.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
