[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mark Miller closed LUCENE-524.
------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

I'm going to say its time to close this with all of the changes/improvements 
that have gone on here. Most of the issues brought up are addressed in a 
different manner. Further changes should be brought up in a new issue.

> Current implementation of fuzzy and wildcard queries inappropriately 
> implemented as Boolean query rewrites
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-524
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-524
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 1.9
>            Reporter: Randy Puttick
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: MultiTermQuery.java, MultiTermScorer.java
>
>
> The implementation of MultiTermQuery in terms of BooleanQuery introduces 
> several problems:
> 1) Collisions with maximum clause limit on boolean queries which throws an 
> exception.  This is most problematic because it is difficult to ascertain in 
> advance how many terms a fuzzy query or wildcard query might involve.
> 2) The boolean disjunctive scoring is not appropriate for either fuzzy or 
> wildcard queries.  In effect the score is divided by the number of terms in 
> the query which has nothing to do with the relevancy of the results.
> 3) Performance of disjunctive boolean queries for large term sets is quite 
> sub-optimal

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to