[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12798510#action_12798510
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2181:
-------------------------------------
Steve ahh i was wondering about the per-field analyzer wrapper (sorry i
neglected to mention this, i just forgot about it)... there are likely other
problems too, and the new stuff needs tests.
What about this per-field thing, what if in the data files, title and date were
simply blank?
Or should we worry, I agree its stupid, does it skew the results though?
One way to look at it is that its also fairly realistic (even though its
meaningless, you see numbers and dates everywhere).
The downside to doing per-analyzer wrapper is that it introduces some
complexity, in all honesty this is not really specific to this collation task,
right? (i.e. the existing analysis/tokenization benchmarks have this same
problem)
> benchmark for collation
> -----------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2181
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2181
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: contrib/benchmark
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-2181.patch, LUCENE-2181.patch,
> top.100k.words.de.en.fr.uk.wikipedia.2009-11.tar.bz2
>
>
> Steven Rowe attached a contrib/benchmark-based benchmark for collation (both
> jdk and icu) under LUCENE-2084, along with some instructions to run it...
> I think it would be a nice if we could turn this into a committable patch and
> add it to benchmark.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
