[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12801775#action_12801775
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2222:
--------------------------------------------
OK I'll commit shortly.
{quote}
For the moment, I first try to use FrameOfRef, and compare it with some simpler
encoding methods such as VInt using the Codec interface. I would like to see if
the BlockReader and Reader interface do not add too much overhead compared to a
simple index input based on vint, and therefore loose the speed benefits we got
on decompression.
{quote}
OK -- sounds interesting -- please report back!
bq. P.S.: Sorry for the first patches, my eclipse is configured to format
automatically the code (add final, this., etc.) and therefore my patches are
generally including all these modifications. Is it a problem for you ?
Actually I don't mind these additions...
> FixedIntBlockIndexInput.Reader does not initialise 'pending' int array
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2222
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2222
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: Flex Branch
> Reporter: Renaud Delbru
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Flex Branch
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2222.patch, LUCENE-2222.patch, LUCENE-2222.patch
>
>
> The FixedIntBlockIndexInput.Reader.pending int array is not initialised. As a
> consequence, the FixedIntBlockIndexInput.Reader#next() method returns always
> 0.
> A call to FixedIntBlockIndexInput.Reader#blockReader.readBlock() during the
> Reader initialisation may solve the issue (to be tested).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
