[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830760#action_12830760
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2080:
-----------------------------------------
I like this extension and I think it is important! Yet, I would use the
following wording instead:
{quote}Additionally, you may need to re-test your entire application to ensure
it behaves like expected, as some defaults may have changed and may break
functionality in your application.{quote}
> Improve the documentation of Version
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2080
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Javadocs
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 2.9.2, 3.0, 3.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch
>
>
> In my opinion, we should elaborate more on the effects of changing the
> Version parameter.
> Particularly, changing this value, even if you recompile your code, likely
> involves reindexing your data.
> I do not think this is adequately clear from the current javadocs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
