[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12831980#action_12831980
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2111:
-------------------------------------
bq. Ahh, and also because your patch switches from String to char[], which
should improve perf.
actually i didnt apply your LUCENE-2111 when running the benchmark (the
improvement is simply the char[]).
the test is now actually slightly slower now with the rest of LUCENE-2111
> Wrapup flexible indexing
> ------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2111
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2111
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: Flex Branch
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2111-EmptyTermsEnum.patch,
> LUCENE-2111-EmptyTermsEnum.patch, LUCENE-2111.patch, LUCENE-2111.patch,
> LUCENE-2111.patch, LUCENE-2111.patch, LUCENE-2111.patch, LUCENE-2111.patch,
> LUCENE-2111.patch, LUCENE-2111_fuzzy.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from LUCENE-1458.
> The flex branch is in fairly good shape -- all tests pass, initial search
> performance testing looks good, it survived several visits from the Unicode
> policeman ;)
> But it still has a number of nocommits, could use some more scrutiny
> especially on the "emulate old API on flex index" and vice/versa code paths,
> and still needs some more performance testing. I'll do these under this
> issue, and we should open separate issues for other self contained fixes.
> The end is in sight!
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
